Titulo:

Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
.

Sumario:

A pesar de los esfuerzos institucionales, aún no se ha logrado la reconciliación entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano, debido en parte al prejuicio que todavía persiste. Presentamos un estudio de conectividad funcional basado en EEG, aplicado a sujetos de cuatro grupos de actores que completaron una Prueba de Asociación Implícita que mide el prejuicio hacia víctimas o combatientes. Analizamos siete medidas de conectividad funcional calculadas en seis bandas de frecuencia y dos condiciones experimentales diferentes. En la tarea conductual, hallamos que las víctimas tienen mayor prejuicio hacia ellas mismas, mientras los civiles tienen mayor prejuicio hacia los combatientes. También encontramos diferencias en algunas medidas... Ver más

Guardado en:

2011-2084

2011-7922

17

2024-09-03

36

46

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

id metarevistapublica_unisanbuenaventura_internationaljournalofpsychologicalresearch_21-article-7333
record_format ojs
institution UNIVERSIDAD DE SAN BUENAVENTURA
thumbnail https://nuevo.metarevistas.org/UNIVERSIDADDESANBUENAVENTURA_COLOMBIA/logo.png
country_str Colombia
collection International Journal of Psychological Research
title Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
spellingShingle Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
Quiza-Montealegre, Jhon Jair
Quintero-Zea, Andrés
Trujillo, Natalia
López, José David
conflicto armado colombiano
ritmos beta
ritmos theta
conectividad funcional
Colombian armed conflict.
functional connectivity
beta rhythm
theta rhythm
title_short Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
title_full Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
title_fullStr Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
title_full_unstemmed Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
title_sort análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
description A pesar de los esfuerzos institucionales, aún no se ha logrado la reconciliación entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano, debido en parte al prejuicio que todavía persiste. Presentamos un estudio de conectividad funcional basado en EEG, aplicado a sujetos de cuatro grupos de actores que completaron una Prueba de Asociación Implícita que mide el prejuicio hacia víctimas o combatientes. Analizamos siete medidas de conectividad funcional calculadas en seis bandas de frecuencia y dos condiciones experimentales diferentes. En la tarea conductual, hallamos que las víctimas tienen mayor prejuicio hacia ellas mismas, mientras los civiles tienen mayor prejuicio hacia los combatientes. También encontramos diferencias en algunas medidas de víctimas y exparamilitares con respecto a los civiles y exguerrilleros, en la banda theta, y de víctimas y exguerrilleros con respecto a los exparamilitares, en la banda beta2. Estos resultados nos ayudan a diseñar intervenciones sociocognitivas más eficaces para reducir los prejuicios.
description_eng Despite institutional efforts, reconciliation among former actors of the Colombian armed conflict has yet to be achieved, with prejudice being one direct driver of this drawback. We present an EEG-based functional connectivity study applied to four groups of former actors who completed an Implicit Association Test designed to measure prejudice toward victims or combatants. We analyzed seven measures of functional connectivity calculated in six different frequency bands and two experimental conditions. In the behavioral task, we found more prejudice toward victims from the same victims and more prejudice of civilians toward combatants. For the connectivity measures, we found differences in theta band among the victims’ and ex-paramilitaries’ groups concerning the civilians’ and ex-guerrillas’ groups, and differences in the beta2 band among the victims’ and ex-guerrillas’ groups concerning the ex-paramilitaries’ group. The results help us design more effective socio-cognitive interventions to reduce prejudice.
author Quiza-Montealegre, Jhon Jair
Quintero-Zea, Andrés
Trujillo, Natalia
López, José David
author_facet Quiza-Montealegre, Jhon Jair
Quintero-Zea, Andrés
Trujillo, Natalia
López, José David
topicspa_str_mv conflicto armado colombiano
ritmos beta
ritmos theta
conectividad funcional
topic conflicto armado colombiano
ritmos beta
ritmos theta
conectividad funcional
Colombian armed conflict.
functional connectivity
beta rhythm
theta rhythm
topic_facet conflicto armado colombiano
ritmos beta
ritmos theta
conectividad funcional
Colombian armed conflict.
functional connectivity
beta rhythm
theta rhythm
citationvolume 17
citationissue 2
citationedition Núm. 2 , Año 2024 : Interdisciplinary Approaches for Human Cognition: Expanding Perspectives on the Mind
publisher Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
ispartofjournal International Journal of Psychological Research
source https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/7333
language Inglés
format Article
rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
references_eng Alto Comisionado para la Paz. (2016). Acuerdo final para la terminación del conflicto y la construcción de una paz estable y duradera. Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz. https://www.jep.gov.co/Marco Normativo/Normativa_v2/01 ACUERDOS/Texto-Nuevo-Acuerdo-Final.pdf?csf=1&e=0fpYA0 Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(10), 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3800 Amodio, D. M., & Cikara, M. (2021). The Social Neuroscience of Prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050928 Baez, S., Santamaría-García, H., & Ibáñez, A. (2019). Disarming ex-combatants’ minds: Toward situated reintegration process in post-conflict Colombia. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JAN), 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00073 Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (2004). From conflict resolution to reconciliation. Oxford University Press. Barnes-Holmes, D., Staunton, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Whelan, R., Stewart, I., Commins, S., Walsh, D., Smeets, P. M., & Dymond, S. (2004). Interfacing relational frame theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, the implicit association test, and event related potentials [Conectando la relational frame theory con la neurociencia cognitiva: Priming semántico, el test de asociación I. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4(2), 215–240. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-26444477995&partnerID=40&md5=5558ef48d1d23c5d35e06c3b76038daa Bastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2016). A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis methods and their interpretational pitfalls. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9(JAN2016), 175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Frings, C. (2023). Towards a systematization of brain oscillatory activity in actions. Communications Biology, 6(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04531-9 Bigdely-Shamlo, N., Mullen, T., Kothe, C., Su, K.-M., & Robbins, K. A. (2015). The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 9(JUNE), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2015.00016 Blomsma, N., de Rooy, B., Gerritse, F., van der Spek, R., Tewarie, P., Hillebrand, A., Otte, W. M., Stam, C. J., & van Dellen, E. (2022). Minimum spanning tree analysis of brain networks: A systematic review of network size effects, sensitivity for neuropsychiatric pathology, and disorder specificity. Network Neuroscience, 6(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00245 Böttcher, A., Wilken, S., Adelhöfer, N., Raab, M., Hoffmann, S., & Beste, C. (2023). A dissociable functional relevance of theta- and beta-band activities during complex sensorimotor integration. Cerebral Cortex, 33(14), 9154–9164. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad191 Cao, R., Hao, Y., Wang, X., Gao, Y., Shi, H., Huo, S., Wang, B., Guo, H., & Xiang, J. (2020). EEG Functional Connectivity Underlying Emotional Valance and Arousal Using Minimum Spanning Trees. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00355 Cavanagh, J. F., & Frank, M. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(8), 414–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
Comisión de la Verdad. (2022). Cifras de la Comisión de la Verdad presentadas junto con el Informe Final (Vol. 1). https://web.comisiondelaverdad.co/actualidad/noticias/principales-cifras-comision-de-la-verdad-informe-final Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2005). Ley 975 de 2005, por la cual se dictan disposiciones para la reincorporación de miembros de grupos armados organizados al margen de la ley, que contribuyan de manera efectiva a la consecución de la paz nacional y se dictan otras disposiciones para acuerdo. Diario Oficial, 45980. Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Introduction to Bayesian Inference for Psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1), 5–34. Forbes, C. E., Cameron, K. A., Grafman, J., Barbey, A. K., Solomon, J., Ritter, W., & Ruchkin, D. (2012). Identifying temporal and causal contributions of neural processes underlying the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(NOVEMBER 2012), 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00320 Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., & Bullmore, E. (2016). Fundamentals of brain network analysis. Academic Press. Friston, K. J. (1994). Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Human Brain Mapping, 2(1‐2), 56–78. Friston, K. J. (2011). Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review. Brain Connectivity, 1(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2011.0008 Gedeon, C., Esseily, R., & Badea, C. (2021). Examining differences in minority versus majority preschoolers on social categorization and perceived intergroup distance. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2479 Gramfort, A. (2013). MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7(7 DEC), 267. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197. Healy, G. F., Boran, L., & Smeaton, A. F. (2015). Neural patterns of the implicit association test. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(NOV), 605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00605 Jas, M., Engemann, D. A., Bekhti, Y., Raimondo, F., & Gramfort, A. (2017). Autoreject: Automated artifact rejection for MEG and EEG data. NeuroImage, 159, 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.030 Jeffreys, H. (1938). Significance tests when several degrees of freedom arise simultaneously. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 165(921), 161–198. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. Kato, K., Kadokura, H., Kuroki, T., & Ishikawa, A. (2018). Event-related synchronization/desynchronization in neural oscillatory changes caused by implicit biases of spatial frequency in electroencephalography. In I. G. S. Lhotska L. Sukupova L., Lackovic I. (Eds.), IFMBE Proceedings, vol 68/2 (Vol. 68, pp. 175–178). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9038-7_32 Keysers, C., Gazzola, V., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nature Neuroscience, 23(7), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4 Kruskal, J. B. (1956). On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 7(1), 48–50. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1956-0078686-7 March, D. S., & Graham, R. (2014). Exploring implicit ingroup and outgroup bias toward Hispanics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214542256 Martin, D. (2014). IAT: Cleaning and Visualizing Implicit Association Test (IAT) Data. Newheiser, A.-K., Dunham, Y., Merrill, A., Hoosain, L., & Olson, K. R. (2014). Preference for high status predicts implicit outgroup bias among children from low-status groups. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1081. Poli, D., Pastore, V. P., & Massobrio, P. (2015). Functional connectivity in in vitro neuronal assemblies. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 0(OCT), 57. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNCIR.2015.00057 Prim, R. C. (1957). Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. The Bell System Technical Journal, 36(6), 1389–1401. Rösler, I. K., & Amodio, D. M. (2022). Neural Basis of Prejudice and Prejudice Reduction. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 7(12), 1200–1208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.10.008 Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage, 52(3), 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 Schindler, S., & Wolff, W. (2015). Cerebral correlates of automatic associations towards performance enhancing substances. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(DEC), 1923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01923 Smit, D., Trevino, L., Mohamed, S. M. H., & Enriquez-Geppert, S. (2023). Theta power and functional connectivity as neurophysiological markers of executive functions in individuals with cognitive complaints in daily life. Biological Psychology, 178, 108503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108503 Stam, C. J., Tewarie, P., Van Dellen, E., van Straaten, E. C. W., Hillebrand, A., & Van Mieghem, P. (2014). The trees and the forest: Characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 92(3), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.04.001 Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader, 56(65), 9780203505984–16. Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C., & Sherman, J. W. (2016). A practical guide to Implicit Association Task and related tasks. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 117-139). Guilford Press Tewarie, P., van Dellen, E., Hillebrand, A., & Stam, C. J. (2015). The minimum spanning tree: An unbiased method for brain network analysis. NeuroImage, 104, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2014.10.015 Trujillo, S., Trujillo, N., Lopez, J. D., Gomez, D., Valencia, S., Rendon, J., Pineda, D. A., & Parra, M. A. (2017). Social cognitive training improves emotional processing and reduces aggressive attitudes in ex-combatants. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 510. Ugarriza, J. E., Villegas, C. A., Trujillo, N., & López, J. D. (2019). Restaurar tejidos sociales en comunidades durante el postconflicto a través de un enfoque de intervención biopsicosocial comprehensivo: estrategias hacia a la construcción de paz en Colombia [Research Project]. Universidad del Rosario. https://pure.urosario.edu.co/es/projects/restoring-social-fabrics-in-communities-during-the-post-conflict- Valencia, S., Trujillo, N., Trujillo, S., Acosta, A., Rodríguez, M., Ugarriza, J. E., López, J. D., García, A. M., & Parra, M. A. (2020). Neurocognitive reorganization of emotional processing following a socio-cognitive intervention in Colombian ex-combatants. Social Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2020.1735511 van Dellen, E., Sommer, I. E., Bohlken, M. M., Tewarie, P., Draaisma, L., Zalesky, A., Di Biase, M., Brown, J. A., Douw, L., Otte, W. M., Mandl, R. C. W., & Stam, C. J. (2018). Minimum spanning tree analysis of the human connectome. Human Brain Mapping, 39(6), 2455–2471. https://doi.org/10.1002/HBM.24014 van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haaf, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský, Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2021). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28(3), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5 Vinck, M., Oostenveld, R., Van Wingerden, M., Battaglia, F., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2011). An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. NeuroImage, 55(4), 1548–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055 Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3 Westfall, P. H., Johnson, W. O., & Utts, J. M. (1997). A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika, 84(2), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/84.2.419 Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). A Default Bayesian Hypothesis Test for ANOVA Designs. The American Statistician, 66(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.695956 Yao, D. (2001). A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity. Physiological Measurement, 22(4), 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/22/4/305 Zakharov, I., Tabueva, A., Adamovich, T., Kovas, Y., & Malykh, S. (2020). Alpha Band Resting-State EEG Connectivity Is Associated With Non-verbal Intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNHUM.2020.00010/BIBTEX
type_driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article
type_coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
type_version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
type_coarversion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
type_content Text
publishDate 2024-09-03
date_accessioned 2024-09-03T00:00:00Z
date_available 2024-09-03T00:00:00Z
url https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/7333
url_doi https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7333
issn 2011-2084
eissn 2011-7922
doi 10.21500/20112084.7333
citationstartpage 36
citationendpage 46
url2_str_mv https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/7333/5489
_version_ 1832800472657821696
spelling Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
EEG
A pesar de los esfuerzos institucionales, aún no se ha logrado la reconciliación entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano, debido en parte al prejuicio que todavía persiste. Presentamos un estudio de conectividad funcional basado en EEG, aplicado a sujetos de cuatro grupos de actores que completaron una Prueba de Asociación Implícita que mide el prejuicio hacia víctimas o combatientes. Analizamos siete medidas de conectividad funcional calculadas en seis bandas de frecuencia y dos condiciones experimentales diferentes. En la tarea conductual, hallamos que las víctimas tienen mayor prejuicio hacia ellas mismas, mientras los civiles tienen mayor prejuicio hacia los combatientes. También encontramos diferencias en algunas medidas de víctimas y exparamilitares con respecto a los civiles y exguerrilleros, en la banda theta, y de víctimas y exguerrilleros con respecto a los exparamilitares, en la banda beta2. Estos resultados nos ayudan a diseñar intervenciones sociocognitivas más eficaces para reducir los prejuicios.
Artículo de revista
conflicto armado colombiano
ritmos beta
ritmos theta
Análisis de conectividad funcional del prejuicio entre antiguos actores del conflicto armado colombiano
conectividad funcional
Universidad San Buenaventura - USB (Colombia)
International Journal of Psychological Research
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/7333
Inglés
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Alto Comisionado para la Paz. (2016). Acuerdo final para la terminación del conflicto y la construcción de una paz estable y duradera. Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz. https://www.jep.gov.co/Marco Normativo/Normativa_v2/01 ACUERDOS/Texto-Nuevo-Acuerdo-Final.pdf?csf=1&e=0fpYA0 Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(10), 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3800 Amodio, D. M., & Cikara, M. (2021). The Social Neuroscience of Prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050928 Baez, S., Santamaría-García, H., & Ibáñez, A. (2019). Disarming ex-combatants’ minds: Toward situated reintegration process in post-conflict Colombia. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JAN), 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00073 Bar-Siman-Tov, Y. (2004). From conflict resolution to reconciliation. Oxford University Press. Barnes-Holmes, D., Staunton, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Whelan, R., Stewart, I., Commins, S., Walsh, D., Smeets, P. M., & Dymond, S. (2004). Interfacing relational frame theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, the implicit association test, and event related potentials [Conectando la relational frame theory con la neurociencia cognitiva: Priming semántico, el test de asociación I. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4(2), 215–240. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-26444477995&partnerID=40&md5=5558ef48d1d23c5d35e06c3b76038daa Bastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2016). A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis methods and their interpretational pitfalls. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9(JAN2016), 175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 Beste, C., Münchau, A., & Frings, C. (2023). Towards a systematization of brain oscillatory activity in actions. Communications Biology, 6(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04531-9 Bigdely-Shamlo, N., Mullen, T., Kothe, C., Su, K.-M., & Robbins, K. A. (2015). The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 9(JUNE), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2015.00016 Blomsma, N., de Rooy, B., Gerritse, F., van der Spek, R., Tewarie, P., Hillebrand, A., Otte, W. M., Stam, C. J., & van Dellen, E. (2022). Minimum spanning tree analysis of brain networks: A systematic review of network size effects, sensitivity for neuropsychiatric pathology, and disorder specificity. Network Neuroscience, 6(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00245 Böttcher, A., Wilken, S., Adelhöfer, N., Raab, M., Hoffmann, S., & Beste, C. (2023). A dissociable functional relevance of theta- and beta-band activities during complex sensorimotor integration. Cerebral Cortex, 33(14), 9154–9164. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad191 Cao, R., Hao, Y., Wang, X., Gao, Y., Shi, H., Huo, S., Wang, B., Guo, H., & Xiang, J. (2020). EEG Functional Connectivity Underlying Emotional Valance and Arousal Using Minimum Spanning Trees. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00355 Cavanagh, J. F., & Frank, M. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(8), 414–421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
Comisión de la Verdad. (2022). Cifras de la Comisión de la Verdad presentadas junto con el Informe Final (Vol. 1). https://web.comisiondelaverdad.co/actualidad/noticias/principales-cifras-comision-de-la-verdad-informe-final Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2005). Ley 975 de 2005, por la cual se dictan disposiciones para la reincorporación de miembros de grupos armados organizados al margen de la ley, que contribuyan de manera efectiva a la consecución de la paz nacional y se dictan otras disposiciones para acuerdo. Diario Oficial, 45980. Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Introduction to Bayesian Inference for Psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1), 5–34. Forbes, C. E., Cameron, K. A., Grafman, J., Barbey, A. K., Solomon, J., Ritter, W., & Ruchkin, D. (2012). Identifying temporal and causal contributions of neural processes underlying the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(NOVEMBER 2012), 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00320 Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., & Bullmore, E. (2016). Fundamentals of brain network analysis. Academic Press. Friston, K. J. (1994). Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Human Brain Mapping, 2(1‐2), 56–78. Friston, K. J. (2011). Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review. Brain Connectivity, 1(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2011.0008 Gedeon, C., Esseily, R., & Badea, C. (2021). Examining differences in minority versus majority preschoolers on social categorization and perceived intergroup distance. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2479 Gramfort, A. (2013). MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7(7 DEC), 267. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197. Healy, G. F., Boran, L., & Smeaton, A. F. (2015). Neural patterns of the implicit association test. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(NOV), 605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00605 Jas, M., Engemann, D. A., Bekhti, Y., Raimondo, F., & Gramfort, A. (2017). Autoreject: Automated artifact rejection for MEG and EEG data. NeuroImage, 159, 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.030 Jeffreys, H. (1938). Significance tests when several degrees of freedom arise simultaneously. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 165(921), 161–198. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. Kato, K., Kadokura, H., Kuroki, T., & Ishikawa, A. (2018). Event-related synchronization/desynchronization in neural oscillatory changes caused by implicit biases of spatial frequency in electroencephalography. In I. G. S. Lhotska L. Sukupova L., Lackovic I. (Eds.), IFMBE Proceedings, vol 68/2 (Vol. 68, pp. 175–178). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9038-7_32 Keysers, C., Gazzola, V., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence. Nature Neuroscience, 23(7), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0660-4 Kruskal, J. B. (1956). On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 7(1), 48–50. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1956-0078686-7 March, D. S., & Graham, R. (2014). Exploring implicit ingroup and outgroup bias toward Hispanics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214542256 Martin, D. (2014). IAT: Cleaning and Visualizing Implicit Association Test (IAT) Data. Newheiser, A.-K., Dunham, Y., Merrill, A., Hoosain, L., & Olson, K. R. (2014). Preference for high status predicts implicit outgroup bias among children from low-status groups. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1081. Poli, D., Pastore, V. P., & Massobrio, P. (2015). Functional connectivity in in vitro neuronal assemblies. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 0(OCT), 57. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNCIR.2015.00057 Prim, R. C. (1957). Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. The Bell System Technical Journal, 36(6), 1389–1401. Rösler, I. K., & Amodio, D. M. (2022). Neural Basis of Prejudice and Prejudice Reduction. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 7(12), 1200–1208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.10.008 Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage, 52(3), 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 Schindler, S., & Wolff, W. (2015). Cerebral correlates of automatic associations towards performance enhancing substances. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(DEC), 1923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01923 Smit, D., Trevino, L., Mohamed, S. M. H., & Enriquez-Geppert, S. (2023). Theta power and functional connectivity as neurophysiological markers of executive functions in individuals with cognitive complaints in daily life. Biological Psychology, 178, 108503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108503 Stam, C. J., Tewarie, P., Van Dellen, E., van Straaten, E. C. W., Hillebrand, A., & Van Mieghem, P. (2014). The trees and the forest: Characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 92(3), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.04.001 Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader, 56(65), 9780203505984–16. Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C., & Sherman, J. W. (2016). A practical guide to Implicit Association Task and related tasks. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 117-139). Guilford Press Tewarie, P., van Dellen, E., Hillebrand, A., & Stam, C. J. (2015). The minimum spanning tree: An unbiased method for brain network analysis. NeuroImage, 104, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2014.10.015 Trujillo, S., Trujillo, N., Lopez, J. D., Gomez, D., Valencia, S., Rendon, J., Pineda, D. A., & Parra, M. A. (2017). Social cognitive training improves emotional processing and reduces aggressive attitudes in ex-combatants. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 510. Ugarriza, J. E., Villegas, C. A., Trujillo, N., & López, J. D. (2019). Restaurar tejidos sociales en comunidades durante el postconflicto a través de un enfoque de intervención biopsicosocial comprehensivo: estrategias hacia a la construcción de paz en Colombia [Research Project]. Universidad del Rosario. https://pure.urosario.edu.co/es/projects/restoring-social-fabrics-in-communities-during-the-post-conflict- Valencia, S., Trujillo, N., Trujillo, S., Acosta, A., Rodríguez, M., Ugarriza, J. E., López, J. D., García, A. M., & Parra, M. A. (2020). Neurocognitive reorganization of emotional processing following a socio-cognitive intervention in Colombian ex-combatants. Social Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2020.1735511 van Dellen, E., Sommer, I. E., Bohlken, M. M., Tewarie, P., Draaisma, L., Zalesky, A., Di Biase, M., Brown, J. A., Douw, L., Otte, W. M., Mandl, R. C. W., & Stam, C. J. (2018). Minimum spanning tree analysis of the human connectome. Human Brain Mapping, 39(6), 2455–2471. https://doi.org/10.1002/HBM.24014 van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haaf, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský, Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2021). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28(3), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5 Vinck, M., Oostenveld, R., Van Wingerden, M., Battaglia, F., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2011). An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. NeuroImage, 55(4), 1548–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055 Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3 Westfall, P. H., Johnson, W. O., & Utts, J. M. (1997). A Bayesian perspective on the Bonferroni adjustment. Biometrika, 84(2), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/84.2.419 Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). A Default Bayesian Hypothesis Test for ANOVA Designs. The American Statistician, 66(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.695956 Yao, D. (2001). A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity. Physiological Measurement, 22(4), 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/22/4/305 Zakharov, I., Tabueva, A., Adamovich, T., Kovas, Y., & Malykh, S. (2020). Alpha Band Resting-State EEG Connectivity Is Associated With Non-verbal Intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNHUM.2020.00010/BIBTEX
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Text
application/pdf
Publication
EEG
Journal article
Despite institutional efforts, reconciliation among former actors of the Colombian armed conflict has yet to be achieved, with prejudice being one direct driver of this drawback. We present an EEG-based functional connectivity study applied to four groups of former actors who completed an Implicit Association Test designed to measure prejudice toward victims or combatants. We analyzed seven measures of functional connectivity calculated in six different frequency bands and two experimental conditions. In the behavioral task, we found more prejudice toward victims from the same victims and more prejudice of civilians toward combatants. For the connectivity measures, we found differences in theta band among the victims’ and ex-paramilitaries’ groups concerning the civilians’ and ex-guerrillas’ groups, and differences in the beta2 band among the victims’ and ex-guerrillas’ groups concerning the ex-paramilitaries’ group. The results help us design more effective socio-cognitive interventions to reduce prejudice.
Quiza-Montealegre, Jhon Jair
Núm. 2 , Año 2024 : Interdisciplinary Approaches for Human Cognition: Expanding Perspectives on the Mind
Quintero-Zea, Andrés
Trujillo, Natalia
2
17
Colombian armed conflict.
López, José David
functional connectivity
beta rhythm
theta rhythm
2024-09-03T00:00:00Z
46
https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/download/7333/5489
2024-09-03T00:00:00Z
36
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7333
10.21500/20112084.7333
2011-7922
2011-2084
2024-09-03